If you have any concern, please let me know. It was not a disk space issue. It is a package of Microsoft C++ components which are required to run some Windows specific applications made with Visual C++. Thanks for allowing me the space to voice my opinion on this subject. Your program can only link to msvcr100 or msvcr110, not to both, that is the reason you only need one vcredist per executable. You can uninstall them if you have the matching version of Visual Studio installed if you are a developer , but that is unlikely.
Disclaimer: I'm not an expert on Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable, so I could be wrong in my assumption that you don't need multiple versions of each year's Redistributable, but as I already said in the beginning I've experienced no problems whatsoever I often play games and use programs that make use of the Redistributables. Reinstall Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable All to no avail? So, how do they all they get there? Installed updates should be anything necessary to run windows. It just keeps making things messier and messier in the list designed for the software the End User chose to install. Sign up to have the e-mailed to you each week. Those were my thoughts before I found this thread. You never really know which of your installed applications rely on each redistributable. If you belong to the second group, you might be wondering what enigmatic Microsoft Visual C++ redistributables are and why you have so many of them installed on your computer.
This is why it should be optional just like the. What is Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable package in Windows? The applications and programs need the specific version of redistributables. That said, save your progress, close all your apps and make sure your important data is properly backed up. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact tnmff microsoft. I can understand what everybody is going through with all these visual c++ icons all over the place. Make sure that Windows update has all its latest updates.
I just had an error where my app couldn't load a. However I'm sure I'm using c++11 features. But in general, I assumed that the 2012 vcredist would include all the functionality of older vcredist. I found a bunch of these things in my programes list and was shocked. When I looked into my programs, voila, I see this pack of programs having that name installed---you guessed it---at the same time I started getting the annoying error message.
For example, you might see multiple versions of the 2008 redistributable. Thus deleting the files may crash some of your Windows programs or applications. The newer Runtimes install sidebyside in the WinSxS fodler and the application uses the version it needs. Thus deleting the files may crash some of your Windows applications. If you run a newer version of Windows most of those are rolled into the install.
You rarely get an error message during installation or operation of a program that points you directly to the redistributable packages. I'd probably elect to delete the Installer entry, but I'm not sure there's a really strong motivation either way. Thanks for the article Leo. I recommend that you keep them. I have no idea if you need just one or both. Don't add crap to my computer, which I told you I don't want, and compound insult with injury by including an error to boot. Like there are 2 installation of 2013, and same for 2015.
What is Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable and do I need it? Everytime i uninstall and reboot it, in the next day it shows up again. If so, reinstall that one back. If you uninstall software that requires a redistributable, you may be left with an unnecessary redistributable on your machine. Any additional versions of the Visual C++ Redistributable you see on your system were installed along with some program that required it. Frameworks are created as each edition of Windows is released approximately , and as technology changes.
Great article and as usual very informative. I also have several versions of C++ 2005, 2010. And leaving them in place is by far the safest thing to do. And unfortunately, unlike with the , Microsoft never consolidated all these older versions into a unified package. All in all, Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable is a pretty handy feature that your apps rely on to work for you.
The best protection against foistware is to read every screen carefully when you install a program, even paid ones as some vendors will go for the few cents they get for bundling foistware. And here's a link to my OneDrive, on which you can find all installers:. Download links are in the list they're also included in the above list, in case you want to go to the download page directly. If you can add me, well and good; if not, well and good… Please let me know… Thank you, Steve Re Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable. The world turned out to be even less ideal than we thought. Or should I attempt to reinstall the first one? That is not actually true? There are several advantages to using a redistributable. Also curious if Macs have these kind of issues? I realize some people will not like this.
Right-click on it and select Run as administrator. So it can't possibly be enough because I am using c++11 features. And while developers still benefit from not needing to re-invent the wheel each time they need it, they do end up shipping and installing that wheel with every program that needs it. Maybe when we remove these programs it will also remove the cc+ program if not needed then when we install a program that needs cc+ then we can get it from Microsoft till then we won't have so many cc+. Dear God, someone with a brain. I have three builds of 2008 and three builds of 2005 two are the same Hello Keith — Welcome to Microsoft Answers Community.